Our transition to the Green Economy does not need to be slow to be just and equitable
“What good is a dollar an hour more in wages if your neighborhood is burning down? What good is another week’s vacation if the lake you used to go to is polluted and you can’t swim in it and the kids can’t play in it?”
Those were questions posed by the legendary labor leader Walter Reuther. Reuther was the president of the United Auto Workers union (UAW) during the first Earth Day in 1970. UAW not only wrote the first check in support of Earth Day but it also contributed mightily to the national organizing effort for the inaugural holiday we still celebrate today.
On Earth Day 1993, I gave my first major speech, on behalf of the Student Environmental Action Coalition. It was at a rally opposing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The experience taught me firsthand how the movements to protect our planet and the rights of working people are tightly linked.
We just celebrated Labor Day in what is projected to be the hottest year on record. It is a great time to celebrate the relationship between labor and the environmental movement—and a time to remember we have the tools to make sure the transition to a clean energy economy does not leave workers behind.
A just transition means creating good green jobs and protecting workers’ rights.
It means ensuring workers have a center seat at the table when discussing climate policy. It means providing workers with the training and support they need to ensure they are ready to work in emerging green industries and making sure they are taken care of in the meantime. And it means investing in the communities directly impacted by the transition.
Last year, Michigan provided the nation with a template for how to get this done. The state’s Clean Energy and Jobs Package is a bold effort to aggressively reduce greenhouse gas pollution and support a rapid transition to clean energy by making sure workers in the automobile, energy, and other sectors benefit.
In our many overlapping movements for progress and justice, it almost always comes down to a battle between organized people and organized money. And organized money has been trying to break up the important friendship between labor and environmentalists for a long time.
We saw this during the debate on Michigan’s historic climate and jobs legislation. Environmental groups, labor organizations, and state officials worked together, in good faith and with open lines of communication, to make sure the principles of a just transition were applied. Part of the legislation was the creation of a special office, under the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity, dedicated to a just transition: the Community & Worker Economic Transition Office. Its purpose is “to develop proactive strategies that help companies and Michiganders take full advantage of the high-tech, high-paying jobs coming to the state.”
When labor leaders testified in favor of the legislation and about the need for that office, at least one opponent of the bill tried to twist their testimony to suggest they were saying clean energy initiatives were killing jobs – which was not what they were saying at all. At times throughout the legislative session, rumors circulated that labor groups were obstructing progress on the bill or trying to move the goalposts on items being negotiated by labor, green groups, and the state. But advocates were able to put down the rumors.
The president of the Michigan AFL-CIO, Ron Bieber, who is a third-generation UAW member and the son of a former UAW president, attributes that to the good faith working relationship between the parties involved.
“When our partners on the enviro side heard any divisive rumors, they knew to be skeptical and that they could just reach out to us and ask,” Bieber says. “And vice versa. Building that trust and partnership based on mutual interest was crucial in preventing efforts to fracture our coalition.”
Michigan has an advantage. It was already a strong union state. But that is also part of the template. States that want their workers to be ready to enjoy the fruits of the next economy should put in place a firm base of protections for workers’ rights.
Any major economic transition, even one as necessary and urgent as the transition to clean energy, must not be done at the expense of our communities and workers. We absolutely can ensure the US leads the world in clean energy, as well as green technology and manufacturing, without leaving workers behind. The new clean energy economy already offers Americans the promise of better health outcomes and lower consumer costs. It can also mean a jobs boom, with better jobs for higher pay.
According to Climate Power, clean energy projects spurred by the Inflation Reduction Act created 312,900 new jobs between August 2022 and May 2024 alone. As clean energy jobs continue to be created, it is projected that 75 percent of them will not require a four-year degree. And the Brookings Institution found that the “mean hourly wages for clean energy jobs exceed national averages by 8 to 19 percent.”
As Walter Reuther noted, all the benefits we want for workers – better, safer, higher-paying jobs – can only be enjoyed to their fullest if the air is breathable, the water is drinkable, and extreme heat and climate-charged weather events aren’t wreaking havoc on their homes and communities.
